Tag Archive for 'enterprise'

Page 2 of 2

Faraday Media – Particls

This series of blog posts - wizards of oz - is to highlight the innovation we have down under. So I begin with Faraday media, a Brisbane based start-up that launched their keynote product today,

Particls is an engine that learns what you are interested in, and alerts you when content on the internet becomes available - through a desktop 'ticker' or pop-up alerts.

Value
1) It's targeted. Particls is an attention engine - it learns what you want to read, and then goes and finds relevant information. That's a powerful tool, for those of us drowning in information overload, and who don't have time to read.

2) It catches your attention. Particls is based on the concept of 'alerts' - information trickles across your screen seemlesly as you do your work, like a news ticker. For the things that matter, an alert will pop-up. The way you deal with information overload is not by shutting yourself out - it's by adjusting the volume on things that you value more than other things.

3) The founders understand privacy. They started the APML standard - a workgroup I joined because it's the best attempt I have seen yet that tackles the issue of privacy on the internet. For example, I can see what the Particls attention engine uses to determine my preferences - lists of people and subjects with "relevance scores". And better yet - it's stored on my hard-disk.

4) It's simple. RSS is a huge innovation on the web, that only a minority of users on the internet understand. The problem with RSS (Real Simple Syndication), is that it's not simple. Particles makes it dead simple to add RSS and track that content.

Conclusion

Why the hell doesn't Fairfax acquire the start-up, rather than wasting time creating yet another publication (incidently in the same city) that we don't have time to read. In my usage of the product, I have been introduced to content that I am interested in, that I never would have realised had existed on the web. In my trials, I have mainly used it to keep track of my research interests, and despite my skepticism about how 'good' the the attention engine is, it has absolutely blown me away.

And it's not just in the consumer space - a colleague (who happens to hold a lot of influence in enterprise architecture of our 140,000 person firm) was blasting RSS one day on an internal blog - saying how we don't yet have the technology to 'filter' information. I told him about Particls - he's now in love. If a guy like him, who shapes IT strategy for a $20 billion consulting firm, can get that excited - that's got to tell you something.

Have you tried to implement enterprise blogging?

Martianus: Hey guys, I think the earth goes around the sun.

Establishment: Don't be ridiculous - everything revolves around the earth. Your idea sucks. Get back to work and let us take care of astrology, because we know best.

Nicholas: Dudes - seriously. It doesn't make sense. Why don't we take a different approach?

Establishment (between themselves): We've got a problem. These kids think that the earth moves and goes around the sun - as if someone was sitting in a car still, and the earth and trees walked and moved! Ridiculous!

Galileo: Hey I've been speaking to a lot of people, and everyone reckons the earth orbits the sun. It's so painfully obvious. Can we please update our textbooks?

Establishment: Excuse me? Have you not looked at Psalm 93:1, Psalm 96:10, and Chronicles 16:30 that state "the world is firmly established, it cannot be moved." It's how we've always said it. We can't let you challenge the Holy Book. The Holy Book is law, and only we can interpret it.

Galileo: What's the big deal? I mean, I'm just saying something that makes sense. Look - everyone else is saying it. It's not like I'm suggesting we need to implement blogging within our enterprise, to unlock our potential. Now that would be ridiculous!

Establishment: Listen - there is no point changing our world view. If we started telling people that, could you imagine? A famine would start, and nineteen percent of people would get a heart-attack because of the dangers of thinking like that - we can't take that risk. The father almighty in his wrath would shake our flat earth, and ruin our existence. Even if it were true, why change? It's not like it would make any difference. Now scram.

Galileo: You guys don't get it - it could really help people, and it's not a big deal. I can't believe the fuss.

Establishment (between themselves): I don't get what this kid is on. Let go and tell his superiors to have a word with him. We can't have this type of thing happening again.

Two hundred years later
Establishment: Yes thank you - we are the pioneers. Our team took some risky moves to experiment with a new way of doing things early on - we often forget that it was us, the establishment, that started all this. If it wasn't for us realising things needed to change, so much innovation would never have occurred. Just think - Einstein never would have worked out the theory of relativity. Thank God for the establishment and the foresight we continue to have this day.

Patents: more harm than good

When I was in Prague two years ago, I met a bloke from Bristol (UK) that very convincingly explained how patents as a concept, are stupid. Because alcohol was involved, I can't recall his actual argument, but it has since made me question: do you really need a patent to protect your business idea?

Narendra Rocherolle, an experienced entrepreneur, has written a good little article explaining when you should, and shouldn't, spend money to protect your IP. Racherolle offers a good analysis, but I am going to extend it by stating that a patent can be dangerous for your business, and not just because of the monetary cost. Radar Networks is my case-study - a stealth-mode "Semantic web" company, that has received a lot of press lately because apparently they are doing something big but they are not going to tell us until later this year.

Continue reading 'Patents: more harm than good'